J. K. Rowling’s first novel for
adults, The Casual Vacancy, is a
masterpiece of characterisation and storytelling that qualifies it as a
literary achievement entirely separate of the author’s previous body of work.
The initial reviews that preceded
the novel’s publication were filled with criticism of Rowling’s use of explicit
language and adult content. These reviews, it seems, failed to take into
consideration the fact that The Casual
Vacancy is an adult novel. Rowling has been very clear about this from the
book’s very first mention, so the focus on these aspects of the novel is highly
superficial, and misinterpreted anyway.
The Casual Vacancy is the story of the members of a small
community, the ways that they are mixed up in each other’s lives, and how their
own selfishness and pettiness obscures the issues of those who genuinely need
help. To disentangle the web of relationships, both whole and broken, of the
characters of Pagford seems near-impossible now that I’ve finished the book,
but I’ll try and elaborate on the plot a little anyway.
Howard Mollison, obese and
falsely genial, is the owner of a deli in Pagford, and the head of the town’s
parish council. He is the antagonist in the campaign to sever Pagford’s ties
with the housing estate dubbed “The Fields” by locals, believing that the
residents there are undeserving of Pagford’s support, and that the picturesque
town would do better without the ugly stain of such a connection tarnishing
their reputation. When Barry Fairbrother, a council member and former Fields
resident, dies unexpectedly, Howard is elated; his main opposition to his
anti-Fields campaign has been conveniently eliminated. A casual vacancy arises
in Barry’s wake, and several members of the community, each with a different
motivation and stance regarding the Fields, step up to fill his shoes. These
include Miles, Howard’s mini-me son; Colin Wall, the nervous and emotional
school principal; and Simon Price, dodgy employee of the local printing shop.
From this premise, Rowling spins her story of small-town corruption and
secrecy. Each of the characters has a secret, and some of them begin appearing
on the parish council’s website, published by an anonymous user, ominously
titled The_Ghost_Of_Barry_Fairbrother. The skeletons in respective townspeople’s
closets begin to appear, and as the past is dredged up, the very fabric of the
community begins to change. For some characters, these exposures effect
positive changes in their lives, and for others, they bring the walls crashing
down around their ears.
Rowling’s characterisation simply
shines in The Casual Vacancy. Each
and every character is so vivid that the reader’s response to them, whether
disgust, sympathy or pity, is visceral and lasting. Rowling imbues nasty,
vicious characters with semi-redeemable qualities that leave the reader
doubting their absolute opinions, and she occasionally renders small behaviours
of the most admirable characters hateful. While this makes for an emotionally
turbulent read, it also results in a highly realistic portrayal of the human
condition. In the broad spectrum of characters Rowling has drawn in The Casual Vacancy, there are those
whose cruelty stems from ignorance or misunderstanding; there are those whose
apparent charity is nothing more than a carefully constructed social veneer;
there are teenagers who appear spiteful and selfish to their parents, but who
carry the burden of a grief to which their parents are oblivious; and, perhaps
most importantly, there are people who are dirty, foul-mouthed, ill-educated
and promiscuous, who, as Rowling points out so very clearly, are human after
all.
This brings me to Krystal Weedon, whose struggle to care for her
four-year-old brother Robbie continues throughout the story. Krystal is a
native of the Fields, and her mother, Terri, is a long-term heroin junkie.
Krystal has a reputation for being violent, and is generally thought of as a
disgusting, foul-mouthed example of why Pagford should excommunicate the
Fields. Despite this, though, several characters throughout the book have
unexpectedly fond memories of Krystal which often showcase her bravery and
confidence in difficult situations. She’s written off by the majority of the
community as a no-hoper, and, although she is oblivious to the goings-on of the
council, it is she who will be affected most directly by their decision to cut
Pagford’s ties with the Fields.
SPOILER ALERT – The section below contains plot spoilers.
A lot of fuss has been made about
Rowling’s fairly explicit criticism of the striation of the British social
classes in this book. Of course, this is a huge part of the novel, but I felt
that it was done beautifully. Krystal’s story ends with a sort of tragic
dignity:
By the time Kay and Gaia arrived, and the
police decided to force their way in, Krystal Weedon had achieved her only
ambition: she had joined her brother where nobody could part them. -481
It takes Krystal (and Robbie’s) death for the
town of Pagford not to realise, but to care about, how badly Krystal had been
in need of help. This event shocks some of the citizens into understanding that
the petty concerns that they had been preoccupied with were nothing compared to
the difficulty Krystal faced every day.
‘…Miles, I saw that boy. Robbie
Weedon. I saw him, Miles.’ She was
panicky, pleading. ‘He was in St Thomas’ playing field when I walked across it
that morning.’
‘In the playing field?’
‘He must hve been wandering around, while they were – he was all alone,’ she said, remembering the sight of him, dirty ad unkempt. She kept asking herself whether, if he had looked cleaner, she might have been more concerned; whether, on some subliminal level, she had confused his obvious signs of neglect with street-smartness, toughness and resilience. ‘I thought he’d come in there to play, but there was nobody with him. He was only three and a half, Miles. Why didn’t I ask him who he was with?’ - 494
‘In the playing field?’
‘He must hve been wandering around, while they were – he was all alone,’ she said, remembering the sight of him, dirty ad unkempt. She kept asking herself whether, if he had looked cleaner, she might have been more concerned; whether, on some subliminal level, she had confused his obvious signs of neglect with street-smartness, toughness and resilience. ‘I thought he’d come in there to play, but there was nobody with him. He was only three and a half, Miles. Why didn’t I ask him who he was with?’ - 494
And while novel’s close sees the
redemption of some characters, others are too mired in their own prejudices to
see past the fact that Krystal was from the Fields, and therefore not worthy of
their concern or even pity. But Rowling, master storyteller that she is, finds
some subtle way to punish these characters, ultimately elevating Krystal as the
martyr of the story.
Many readers seem to be searching
for the link between Hogwarts and Pagford. Rowling has been quite explicit
about the fact that there is none.
You might see glimpses of some of the same issues that were embedded in the
fantastic world of Harry Potter, such as the class divide, but The Burrow is
far from the Fields of The Casual Vacancy.
In this novel, poverty is not quaint and cozy, but mismanaged and the cause of disease,
neglect and death. That said, I do see a connection between the Harry Potter
novels and Rowling’s first adult novel. The world of Harry Potter contains many
moral lessons for the millions of fans who read the books. For example, issues
of discrimination are addressed perhaps without many young readers realising,
when lupine Professor Lupin is driven from his post at Hogwarts for a condition
he cannot help having. Similarly, we are positioned to be somewhat repulsed by
the Malfoys’ decadent mansion, and to feel at home in the dilapidated house of
the Weasleys, subliminally coming to associate wealth with evil, and poverty with
good, hard-working people (Harry himself always says he would give up his
wealth for the Weasleys if only they would let him). The Harry Potter novels,
therefore, are a sort of fable – they contain moral lessons imparted by the
behaviour of the characters.
I see The Casual Vacancy as a
moral tale for adults. The way in which the villagers of Pagford are bound up
in their own lives and petty concerns may seem extreme to us, as readers, but
when examined closely, is recognisable. Through superficial Samantha Mollison,
misogynistic Gavin, cruel, cold-hearted Fats Wall and nervy Sukhvinder, Rowling
expounds a new moral message – look around, and take note of those who need
your help. Put aside your own concerns, and listen to those of the people around
you, even if they are not being spoken aloud. Use your resources for the
greater good, and not for the immediate gratification of the few.
Yes, The Casual Vacancy is about social class, and yes, there’s a lot of
swearing, abuse, drug use and sex in this novel. No, of course it isn’t another Harry Potter, it’s far from it. But it is
just as good.